| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
25/10/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
28/02/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
|
Autor : |
SCARLATO, S.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; BORTAGARAY, I.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, M.; AGUERRE, V. |
|
Afiliación : |
SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ISABEL BORTAGARAY SABARROS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIANA SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Co-innovation as an effective approach to promote changes in farm management in livestock systems in Uruguay. |
|
Complemento del título : |
T8. Co-design and co-innovation with farmers and stakeholders: methods, results and challenges. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium for farming systems design. Multi-functional farming systems in a changing world. Montpellier (Francia): European Society of Agronomy, 2015. |
|
Páginas : |
p. 283-284 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Contenido : |
In Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the area of the country. Low levels of sustainability were diagnosed in livestock family farming systems based on natural grasslands in Uruguay, being the main causes low meat yield and income. Scientific evidence shows that it is possible to increase production while preserving natural resources and enhancing ecosystem services through changes in management practices of pastures and animals (Nabinger et al., 2011). However, during the last decades low levels of technological innovation has been applied in livestock systems. Lack of improvement by farmers could be explained by the weakness and the traditional approach of the extension service. From a traditional approach, innovations are designed externally to the systems and farmers adopt those innovations by an “extension” process. Extension linearly involves awareness of the problem by the farmer, interest in the solution, evaluation, experimentation and finally adoption (Cramb, 2000). Nevertheless, the active participation of the farmers in the diagnosis and redesign might maximize the impact of the proposals generated, promoting learning processes that support innovation in practices in the long term (Leeuwis & Van der Ban, 2004). The co-innovation approach combines complex systems theory, social learning and dynamic project monitoring and evaluation to stimulate strategic re-orientation of family farm systems (Rossing et al., 2010). We hypothesized that a systemic and participative approach such as this one is necessary for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability, being the learning process in farmers as important as the bio-physical changes in their production systems. MenosIn Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the area of the country. Low levels of sustainability were diagnosed in livestock family farming systems based on natural grasslands in Uruguay, being the main causes low meat yield and income. Scientific evidence shows that it is possible to increase production while preserving natural resources and enhancing ecosystem services through changes in management practices of pastures and animals (Nabinger et al., 2011). However, during the last decades low levels of technological innovation has been applied in livestock systems. Lack of improvement by farmers could be explained by the weakness and the traditional approach of the extension service. From a traditional approach, innovations are designed externally to the systems and farmers adopt those innovations by an “extension” process. Extension linearly involves awareness of the problem by the farmer, interest in the solution, evaluation, experimentation and finally adoption (Cramb, 2000). Nevertheless, the active participation of the farmers in the diagnosis and redesign might maximize the impact of the proposals generated, promoting learning processes that support innovation in practices in the long term (Leeuwis & Van der Ban, 2004). The co-innovation approach combines complex systems theory, social learning and dynamic project monitoring and evaluation to stimulate strategic re-orientation of family farm systems (Rossing et al., 2010)... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS; PRODUCCION FAMILIAR; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6242/1/Scarlato-S.-2015.-5th-Int.Symp.Farming-Systems-Montpellier.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02596nam a2200217 a 4500
001 1055899
005 2020-02-28
008 2015 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d
100 1 $aSCARLATO, S.
245 $aCo-innovation as an effective approach to promote changes in farm management in livestock systems in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium for farming systems design. Multi-functional farming systems in a changing world. Montpellier (Francia): European Society of Agronomy$c2015
300 $ap. 283-284
520 $aIn Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the area of the country. Low levels of sustainability were diagnosed in livestock family farming systems based on natural grasslands in Uruguay, being the main causes low meat yield and income. Scientific evidence shows that it is possible to increase production while preserving natural resources and enhancing ecosystem services through changes in management practices of pastures and animals (Nabinger et al., 2011). However, during the last decades low levels of technological innovation has been applied in livestock systems. Lack of improvement by farmers could be explained by the weakness and the traditional approach of the extension service. From a traditional approach, innovations are designed externally to the systems and farmers adopt those innovations by an “extension” process. Extension linearly involves awareness of the problem by the farmer, interest in the solution, evaluation, experimentation and finally adoption (Cramb, 2000). Nevertheless, the active participation of the farmers in the diagnosis and redesign might maximize the impact of the proposals generated, promoting learning processes that support innovation in practices in the long term (Leeuwis & Van der Ban, 2004). The co-innovation approach combines complex systems theory, social learning and dynamic project monitoring and evaluation to stimulate strategic re-orientation of family farm systems (Rossing et al., 2010). We hypothesized that a systemic and participative approach such as this one is necessary for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability, being the learning process in farmers as important as the bio-physical changes in their production systems.
653 $aLIVESTOCK SYSTEMS
653 $aPRODUCCION FAMILIAR
653 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR
700 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M.
700 1 $aBORTAGARAY, I.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, M.
700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
31/03/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
15/09/2016 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Poster |
|
Autor : |
SAN JULIÁN, R.; DE SOUZA, G.; VAZQUEZ, A.; BANCHERO, G.; CIAPPESONI, G. |
|
Afiliación : |
ROBERTO SAN JULIAN SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUILLERMO DE SOUZA CAMARGO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JORGE ANDRES VAZQUEZ TEXEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS GABRIEL CIAPPESONI SCARONE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Biotipos prolíficos carnicero: iii- rendimiento carnicero y calidad de carne. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: JORNADAS URUGUAYAS EN TECNOLOGÍAS DE IMPACTO EN REPRODUCCIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN DE RUMIANTES, 2015. Salto, UY: PDU de Rumiantes del Centro Litoral Norte; Centro Médico Veterinario de Salto ; Área Biotecnología de la Reproducción Animal de Facultad de Veterinaria. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Palabras claves : |
BIOTIPOS CARNICEROS; BIOTIPOS PROLÍFICOS. |
|
Thesagro : |
CALIDAD DE LA CARNE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6030/1/20-Calidad-carne-biotipos-prolificos-carniceros.-Salto-2015.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00792nam a2200181 a 4500
001 1054574
005 2016-09-15
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSAN JULIÁN, R.
245 $aBiotipos prolíficos carnicero$biii- rendimiento carnicero y calidad de carne.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: JORNADAS URUGUAYAS EN TECNOLOGÍAS DE IMPACTO EN REPRODUCCIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN DE RUMIANTES, 2015. Salto, UY: PDU de Rumiantes del Centro Litoral Norte; Centro Médico Veterinario de Salto ; Área Biotecnología de la Reproducción Animal de Facultad de Veterinaria.$c2015
650 $aCALIDAD DE LA CARNE
653 $aBIOTIPOS CARNICEROS
653 $aBIOTIPOS PROLÍFICOS
700 1 $aDE SOUZA, G.
700 1 $aVAZQUEZ, A.
700 1 $aBANCHERO, G.
700 1 $aCIAPPESONI, G.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
